Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Gemma 2 (Any Size)

LM Studio

Intelligence Score 65/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window Varies
Pricing Model Free / Open

Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)

A-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 87/100
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 87/100 vs 65/100, Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) outperforms Gemma 2 (Any Size) by 22 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Llama 3.1 70B (via routing).
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Gemma 2 (Any Size)
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
Context Window
Varies 128K
Architecture
Transformer Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score
~60-64% ~80-84%
Release Date
2024 Jul 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
Hardware limited 60 RPM
Daily Limit
Unlimited Credit-based
Capabilities
Reasoning
No specific data
Performance Tier
C-Tier (Good) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
Medium âš¡ Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Undisclosed 70B
Limitations
  • Closed source application
  • Large downloads
  • Hardware dependent performance
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
Key Strengths
  • Model Discovery: Built-in search of HuggingFace
  • GGUF Support: Optimized quantized models
  • GPU Offload: Mix CPU/GPU layers
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing

Similar Comparisons