Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

GPT-4o (via Coze)

S-TIER

Coze

Intelligence Score 92/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Free / Open
View Provider Analysis →

Phi-3.5 Mini

Ollama

Intelligence Score 65/100
Context Window 128K tokens
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

GPT-4o (via Coze) Wins

With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 65/100, GPT-4o (via Coze) outperforms Phi-3.5 Mini by 27 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for GPT-4o (via Coze).
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
GPT-4o (via Coze)
Phi-3.5 Mini
Context Window
128K 128K tokens
Architecture
Transformer (Proprietary) Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~85-87% ~60-64%
Release Date
May-Nov 2024 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
Varies by model Hardware limited
Daily Limit
Token-based daily limits Unlimited
Capabilities
Vision
Reasoning
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) C-Tier (Good)
Speed Estimate
Medium ⚡ Very Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose ⚡ Fast Chat & Apps
Model Size
~1.8T (estimated) Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Daily token limits on free tier
  • Platform-specific API format
  • Bot-centric usage model
  • Depends on your RAM/GPU
  • Laptop fans will spin up
  • Large models (70B+) need heavy hardware
Key Strengths
  • Visual bot/agent builder
  • Multi-model access (GPT-4o, Gemini)
  • Plugin marketplace
  • Local Inference: Data never leaves your device
  • Modelfiles: Script your own system prompts
  • API: Local REST API for app integration

Similar Comparisons

GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
Phi-3.5 Mini
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
Gemma 2 9B
Phi-3.5 Mini
vs
Gemma 2 9B
GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
Mistral Nemo 12B
Phi-3.5 Mini
vs
Mistral Nemo 12B
Phi-3.5 Mini
vs
DeepSeek Coder V2
Phi-3.5 Mini
vs
GPT-4o
Phi-3.5 Mini
vs
Gemini 1.5 Pro (via Coze)
Phi-3.5 Mini
vs
GPT-4o (via routing)