Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
GPT-4o (via routing)
S-TIERRequesty
Intelligence Score
92/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
GLM-4.5-Flash
A-TIERZ.AI (GLM)
Intelligence Score
83/100
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
GPT-4o (via routing) Wins
With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 83/100, GPT-4o (via routing) outperforms GLM-4.5-Flash by 9 points.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
GPT-4o (via routing)
|
GLM-4.5-Flash
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
128K | 128K |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Proprietary) | Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~85-87% | ~75-79% |
|
Release Date
|
May-Nov 2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
60 RPM | ~1 request/second (Flash models) |
|
Daily Limit
|
Credit-based | ~1,000 requests/day (Flash tier) |
|
Capabilities
|
Vision
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
A-Tier (Excellent) | B-Tier (Strong) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | ⚡ Very Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | ⚡ Fast Chat & Apps |
|
Model Size
|
~1.8T (estimated) | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
GPT-4o
GLM-4.5-Flash
vs
GPT-4o
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
GPT-4o (via Coze)
GLM-4.5-Flash
vs
GPT-4o (via Coze)
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
GLM-4.5-Flash
vs
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
GLM-4.5-Flash
vs
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
GLM-4.5-Flash
vs
GLM-4.7-Flash