Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
GPT-4o (via routing)
DEPRECATEDRequesty
This model is no longer active/free — kept for reference.
Intelligence Score
92/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Grok 4.1 Fast
DEPRECATEDGrok (xAI)
This model is no longer active/free — kept for reference.
Intelligence Score
96/100
Context Window
2M
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Grok 4.1 Fast Wins
With an intelligence score of 96/100 vs 92/100, Grok 4.1 Fast outperforms GPT-4o (via routing) by 4 points.
Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
GPT-4o (via routing)
|
Grok 4.1 Fast
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
128K | 2M |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Proprietary) | Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~85-87% | ~92-95% |
|
Release Date
|
May-Nov 2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Paid / Commercial |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
60 RPM | Varies (low for free tier) |
|
Daily Limit
|
50 requests/day (new orgs) / 200 requests/day (paying orgs), shared across all free models | Credit-based |
|
Capabilities
|
Vision
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
A-Tier (Excellent) | S-Tier (Elite) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
~1.8T (estimated) | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
GPT-4o
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
GPT-4o
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
GPT-4o (via Coze)
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
GPT-4o (via Coze)
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
Poolside Laguna XS.2
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
Poolside Laguna M.1
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
grok-4.6