Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
GPT-4o (via routing)
DEPRECATEDRequesty
This model is no longer active/free — kept for reference.
Intelligence Score
92/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
grok-4.6
S-TIERGrokified
Intelligence Score
98/100
Context Window
Unknown
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
grok-4.6 Wins
With an intelligence score of 98/100 vs 92/100, grok-4.6 outperforms GPT-4o (via routing) by 6 points.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
GPT-4o (via routing)
|
grok-4.6
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
128K | Unknown |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Proprietary) | Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~85-87% | ~92-95% |
|
Release Date
|
May-Nov 2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
60 RPM | No request-count cap; 32K input tokens/request |
|
Daily Limit
|
50 requests/day (new orgs) / 200 requests/day (paying orgs), shared across all free models | $8/day and $3/hour of free credit |
|
Capabilities
|
Vision
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
A-Tier (Excellent) | S-Tier (Elite) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
~1.8T (estimated) | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
GPT-4o
grok-4.6
vs
GPT-4o
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
GPT-4o (via Coze)
grok-4.6
vs
GPT-4o (via Coze)
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
grok-4.6
vs
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
grok-4.6
vs
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
grok-4.6
vs
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra
grok-4.6
vs
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super
grok-4.6
vs
Poolside Laguna XS.2
grok-4.6
vs
Poolside Laguna M.1
grok-4.6
vs
grok-4.3