Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

GPT-4o (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 92/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Microsoft: Phi-3 Medium (free)

OpenRouter

Intelligence Score 65/100
Context Window 128k
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

GPT-4o (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 65/100, GPT-4o (via routing) outperforms Microsoft: Phi-3 Medium (free) by 27 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for GPT-4o (via routing).
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
GPT-4o (via routing)
Microsoft: Phi-3 Medium (free)
Context Window
128K 128k
Architecture
Transformer (Proprietary) Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~85-87% ~60-64%
Release Date
May-Nov 2024 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM 20 requests/minute
Daily Limit
Credit-based 50 requests/day (up to 1000 with $10 topup)
Capabilities
Vision
No specific data
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) C-Tier (Good)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
~1.8T (estimated) Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
  • Limits depend on account history/topup
  • Community key models
  • Free models have lower priority during peak demand
Key Strengths
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing
  • Unified API for 100+ models from all providers
  • OpenAI-compatible endpoint (drop-in replacement)
  • Automatic model fallback and routing

Similar Comparisons