Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

GPT-4o (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 92/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

nvr-tts-en-us

OVH AI Endpoints

Intelligence Score 65/100
Context Window Audio
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

GPT-4o (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 65/100, GPT-4o (via routing) outperforms nvr-tts-en-us by 27 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for GPT-4o (via routing).
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
GPT-4o (via routing)
nvr-tts-en-us
Context Window
128K Audio
Architecture
Transformer (Proprietary) Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~85-87% ~60-64%
Release Date
May-Nov 2024 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM 2 RPM (Anonymous) / 400 RPM (Auth)
Daily Limit
Credit-based Unspecified
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) C-Tier (Good)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
~1.8T (estimated) Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
  • Beta service, may end or change
  • 2 requests/minute for anonymous usage
  • Requires token for higher limits (400 RPM)
Key Strengths
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing
  • Data sovereignty (EU)
  • Beta access to premium models
  • Simple integration

Similar Comparisons