Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

GPT-4o (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 92/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Phi-3 Mini 4K Instruct

Glhf.chat

Intelligence Score 76/100
Context Window 4K
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

GPT-4o (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 76/100, GPT-4o (via routing) outperforms Phi-3 Mini 4K Instruct by 16 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for GPT-4o (via routing).
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
GPT-4o (via routing)
Phi-3 Mini 4K Instruct
Context Window
128K 4K
Architecture
Transformer (Proprietary) Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~85-87% ~70-74%
Release Date
May-Nov 2024 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM 30 RPM
Daily Limit
Credit-based Generous for personal use
Capabilities
Vision
No specific data
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) B-Tier (Strong)
Speed Estimate
Medium ⚡ Very Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose ⚡ Fast Chat & Apps
Model Size
~1.8T (estimated) Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
  • Rate limits on free tier
  • Model availability may vary
  • Smaller selection than aggregators
Key Strengths
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing
  • Fully serverless (no infrastructure to manage)
  • OpenAI-compatible API format
  • HuggingFace model IDs supported

Similar Comparisons