Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

GPT-4o (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 92/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B

A-TIER

SambaNova Cloud

Intelligence Score 89/100
Context Window 32k Context
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

GPT-4o (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 89/100, GPT-4o (via routing) outperforms Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B by 3 points.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
GPT-4o (via routing)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
Context Window
128K 32k Context
Architecture
Transformer (Proprietary) Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score
~85-87% ~80-84%
Release Date
May-Nov 2024 Sep-Nov 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM Varies by model
Daily Limit
Credit-based Dependent on credits
Capabilities
Vision
No specific data
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose 💻 Code Generation
Model Size
~1.8T (estimated) 32B
Limitations
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
  • Free credits are one-time for new users
  • Context window varies by model (8k - 128k)
  • Rate limits apply to free tier
Key Strengths
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing
  • SambaNova SN40L RDU Chip
  • Dataflow Architecture
  • Record-Breaking Speed

Similar Comparisons