Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

GPT-4o (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 92/100

Model Popularity 0 votes

Context Window 128K

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

View Provider Analysis →

Upstage

Intelligence Score 77/100

Context Window 32K tokens

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Model Popularity 0 votes

View Provider Analysis →

FINAL VERDICT

With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 77/100, GPT-4o (via routing) outperforms Solar Mini by 15 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for GPT-4o (via routing).

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Feature	GPT-4o (via routing)	Solar Mini
Context Window	128K	32K tokens
Architecture	Transformer (Proprietary)	Transformer
Est. MMLU Score	~85-87%	~70-74%
Release Date	May-Nov 2024	2024
Pricing Model	Paid / Commercial	Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)	60 RPM	60 RPM
Daily Limit	Credit-based	Credit-based
Capabilities	Vision	No specific data
Performance Tier	A-Tier (Excellent)	B-Tier (Strong)
Speed Estimate	Medium	⚡ Very Fast
Primary Use Case	General Purpose	⚡ Fast Chat & Apps
Model Size	~1.8T (estimated)	Undisclosed
Limitations	Requires underlying provider API keys Free credit amount is limited Routing adds minimal latency	Credits expire after 3 months Focus on document processing Smaller context window (32k)
Key Strengths	AI Router: automatic provider failover Prompt caching for cost savings Multi-provider load balancing	Solar Architecture: Depth-Up-Scaling Specialized in OCR and Document Parse Translation capabilities (KO/EN/JA)