Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

GPT-4o (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 92/100

Model Popularity 0 votes

Context Window 128K

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

View Provider Analysis →

llamafile

Intelligence Score 64/100

Context Window Local

Pricing Model Free / Open

Model Popularity 0 votes

View Provider Analysis →

FINAL VERDICT

With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 64/100, GPT-4o (via routing) outperforms TinyLlama by 28 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for GPT-4o (via routing).

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Feature	GPT-4o (via routing)	TinyLlama
Context Window	128K	Local
Architecture	Transformer (Proprietary)	Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score	~85-87%	~60-64%
Release Date	May-Nov 2024	2024
Pricing Model	Paid / Commercial	Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)	60 RPM	Hardware dependent
Daily Limit	Credit-based	Unlimited
Capabilities	Vision	No specific data
Performance Tier	A-Tier (Excellent)	C-Tier (Good)
Speed Estimate	Medium	Medium
Primary Use Case	General Purpose	General Purpose
Model Size	~1.8T (estimated)	Undisclosed
Limitations	Requires underlying provider API keys Free credit amount is limited Routing adds minimal latency	File sizes are large (contain weights) CLI usage often required Windows requires appending .exe
Key Strengths	AI Router: automatic provider failover Prompt caching for cost savings Multi-provider load balancing	Executable weight files (multi-OS) Integrated Web UI OpenAI Compatible API server