Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

TinyLlama

llamafile

Intelligence Score 64/100

Model Popularity 0 votes

Context Window Local

Pricing Model Free / Open

View Provider Analysis →

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 93/100

Context Window 200K

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Model Popularity 0 votes

View Provider Analysis →

FINAL VERDICT

With an intelligence score of 93/100 vs 64/100, Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) outperforms TinyLlama by 29 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing).

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Feature	TinyLlama	Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
Context Window	Local	200K
Architecture	Transformer (Open Weight)	Transformer (Proprietary)
Est. MMLU Score	~60-64%	~88-91%
Release Date	2024	Jun-Oct 2024
Pricing Model	Free Tier	Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)	Hardware dependent	60 RPM
Daily Limit	Unlimited	Credit-based
Capabilities	No specific data	Reasoning
Performance Tier	C-Tier (Good)	S-Tier (Elite)
Speed Estimate	Medium	Medium
Primary Use Case	General Purpose	General Purpose
Model Size	Undisclosed	Unknown
Limitations	File sizes are large (contain weights) CLI usage often required Windows requires appending .exe	Requires underlying provider API keys Free credit amount is limited Routing adds minimal latency
Key Strengths	Executable weight files (multi-OS) Integrated Web UI OpenAI Compatible API server	AI Router: automatic provider failover Prompt caching for cost savings Multi-provider load balancing