Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
GPT-4o
S-TIEROpenAI
Intelligence Score
92/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Commercial/Paid Model
Qwen 2.5 72B
S-TIERHyperbolic
Intelligence Score
91/100
Context Window
32K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
GPT-4o Wins
With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 91/100, GPT-4o outperforms Qwen 2.5 72B by 1 point.
Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
GPT-4o
|
Qwen 2.5 72B
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
128K | 32K |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Proprietary) | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~85-87% | ~85-87% |
|
Release Date
|
May-Nov 2024 | Sep-Nov 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Paid / Commercial |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
10,000 RPM | 60 RPM |
|
Daily Limit
|
Based on tier | Credit-based |
|
Capabilities
|
Vision
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
A-Tier (Excellent) | A-Tier (Excellent) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | ⚡ Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
~1.8T (estimated) | 72B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
GPT-4o
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
GPT-4o
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
GPT-4o
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
DeepSeek V3
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen3 32B