Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Groq Compound

Groq

Intelligence Score 65/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 250 RPD, 70k TPM
Pricing Model Free / Open
View Provider Analysis →

DeepSeek Coder V2

A-TIER

Ollama

Intelligence Score 85/100
Context Window 64K tokens
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

DeepSeek Coder V2 Wins

With an intelligence score of 85/100 vs 65/100, DeepSeek Coder V2 outperforms Groq Compound by 20 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for DeepSeek Coder V2.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Groq Compound
DeepSeek Coder V2
Context Window
250 RPD, 70k TPM 64K tokens
Architecture
Transformer Dense Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~60-64% ~80-84%
Release Date
2024 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
30 RPM, 14.4k RPD Hardware limited
Daily Limit
14,400 Requests/Day Unlimited
Capabilities
No specific data
No specific data
Performance Tier
C-Tier (Good) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose 💻 Code Generation
Model Size
Undisclosed Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Test
  • Depends on your RAM/GPU
  • Laptop fans will spin up
  • Large models (70B+) need heavy hardware
Key Strengths
  • LPU Accelerated
  • Extremely Fast Inference
  • Open Source Models
  • Local Inference: Data never leaves your device
  • Modelfiles: Script your own system prompts
  • API: Local REST API for app integration

Similar Comparisons

Groq Compound
vs
DeepSeek: R1 (free)
DeepSeek Coder V2
vs
DeepSeek: R1 (free)
Groq Compound
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
DeepSeek Coder V2
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Groq Compound
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
DeepSeek Coder V2
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
DeepSeek Coder V2
vs
Gemma 2 9B
DeepSeek Coder V2
vs
Mistral Nemo 12B
DeepSeek Coder V2
vs
Phi-3.5 Mini
DeepSeek Coder V2
vs
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek Coder V2
vs
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek Coder V2
vs
Allam 2 7B