Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

Groq Compound

Groq

Intelligence Score 65/100

Model Popularity 0 votes

Context Window 250 RPD, 70k TPM

Pricing Model Free / Open

View Provider Analysis →

S-TIER

Google AI Studio

Intelligence Score 96/100

Context Window 1M Context, 30 RPM

Pricing Model Free / Open

Model Popularity 0 votes

View Provider Analysis →

FINAL VERDICT

With an intelligence score of 96/100 vs 65/100, Gemini 3.0 Flash outperforms Groq Compound by 31 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Gemini 3.0 Flash.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Feature	Groq Compound	Gemini 3.0 Flash
Context Window	250 RPD, 70k TPM	1M Context, 30 RPM
Architecture	Transformer	Transformer (Proprietary)
Est. MMLU Score	~60-64%	~92-95%
Release Date	2024	2026 (Expected)
Pricing Model	Free Tier	Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)	30 RPM, 14.4k RPD	5-30 RPM (varies by model)
Daily Limit	14,400 Requests/Day	9000 RPD (Flash) / 25 RPD (3.1 Pro)
Capabilities	No specific data	Multimodal
Performance Tier	C-Tier (Good)	S-Tier (Elite)
Speed Estimate	Medium	⚡ Very Fast
Primary Use Case	General Purpose	⚡ Fast Chat & Apps
Model Size	Undisclosed	~1.5T (estimated)
Limitations	Test	Data used for training (Unpaid tier) Rate limits are enforced per minute/day No SLA for free tier
Key Strengths	LPU Accelerated Extremely Fast Inference Open Source Models	Multimodal Capabilities Huge Context Window (up to 2M tokens) Fast Inference Speed