Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Groq Compound

Groq

Intelligence Score 65/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 250 RPD, 70k TPM
Pricing Model Free / Open
View Provider Analysis →

LLaVA 1.5

A-TIER

llamafile

Intelligence Score 81/100
Context Window Local
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

LLaVA 1.5 Wins

With an intelligence score of 81/100 vs 65/100, LLaVA 1.5 outperforms Groq Compound by 16 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for LLaVA 1.5.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Groq Compound
LLaVA 1.5
Context Window
250 RPD, 70k TPM Local
Architecture
Transformer Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~60-64% ~75-79%
Release Date
2024 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
30 RPM, 14.4k RPD Hardware dependent
Daily Limit
14,400 Requests/Day Unlimited
Capabilities
No specific data
Vision
Performance Tier
C-Tier (Good) B-Tier (Strong)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Undisclosed Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Test
  • File sizes are large (contain weights)
  • CLI usage often required
  • Windows requires appending .exe
Key Strengths
  • LPU Accelerated
  • Extremely Fast Inference
  • Open Source Models
  • Executable weight files (multi-OS)
  • Integrated Web UI
  • OpenAI Compatible API server

Similar Comparisons

Groq Compound
vs
Llama 4 Maverick 17B
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Llama 4 Maverick 17B
Groq Compound
vs
Llama 4 Scout
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Llama 4 Scout
Groq Compound
vs
Whisper Large v3
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Whisper Large v3
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Whisper Large v3 Turbo
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Groq Compound Mini
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Llama Guard 4 12B
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Moonshot Kimi K2
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Moonshot Kimi K2 0905
LLaVA 1.5
vs
GPT-OSS 120B