Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Groq Compound
Groq
Intelligence Score
65/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
250 RPD, 70k TPM
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Qwen 2.5 72B
S-TIERHyperbolic
Intelligence Score
91/100
Context Window
32K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Qwen 2.5 72B Wins
With an intelligence score of 91/100 vs 65/100, Qwen 2.5 72B outperforms Groq Compound by 26 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Qwen 2.5 72B.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Groq Compound
|
Qwen 2.5 72B
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
250 RPD, 70k TPM | 32K |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~60-64% | ~85-87% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | Sep-Nov 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Paid / Commercial |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
30 RPM, 14.4k RPD | 60 RPM |
|
Daily Limit
|
14,400 Requests/Day | Credit-based |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
C-Tier (Good) | A-Tier (Excellent) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | ⚡ Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | 72B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Groq Compound
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
Groq Compound
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
Groq Compound
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
DeepSeek V3
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Allam 2 7B