Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Groq Compound

Groq

Intelligence Score 65/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 250 RPD, 70k TPM
Pricing Model Free / Open
View Provider Analysis →

Yi Vision

01.AI

Intelligence Score 79/100
Context Window 4K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
Commercial/Paid Model
FINAL VERDICT

Yi Vision Wins

With an intelligence score of 79/100 vs 65/100, Yi Vision outperforms Groq Compound by 14 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Groq Compound
Yi Vision
Context Window
250 RPD, 70k TPM 4K
Architecture
Transformer Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~60-64% ~70-74%
Release Date
2024 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
30 RPM, 14.4k RPD 10,000 RPM
Daily Limit
14,400 Requests/Day Based on tier
Capabilities
No specific data
Function Calling Streaming JSON Mode
Performance Tier
C-Tier (Good) B-Tier (Strong)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose 👁️ Vision & Multimodal
Model Size
Undisclosed Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Test
  • API key required
  • Rate limits apply
  • Pay-per-token pricing
Key Strengths
  • LPU Accelerated
  • Extremely Fast Inference
  • Open Source Models
  • Advanced reasoning
  • Code generation
  • Creative writing

Similar Comparisons

Groq Compound
vs
Llama 4 Maverick 17B
Yi Vision
vs
Llama 4 Maverick 17B
Groq Compound
vs
Llama 4 Scout
Yi Vision
vs
Llama 4 Scout
Groq Compound
vs
Whisper Large v3
Yi Vision
vs
Whisper Large v3
Yi Vision
vs
Whisper Large v3 Turbo
Yi Vision
vs
Groq Compound Mini
Yi Vision
vs
Llama Guard 4 12B
Yi Vision
vs
Moonshot Kimi K2
Yi Vision
vs
Moonshot Kimi K2 0905
Yi Vision
vs
GPT-OSS 120B