Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
A-TIERRequesty
Intelligence Score
83/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
262K Context
Pricing Model
Free / Open
GLM-4.7-Flash
A-TIERZ.AI (GLM)
Intelligence Score
83/100
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash Wins
Equal intelligence scores (83/100), but inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash offers a significantly larger context window.
Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
|
GLM-4.7-Flash
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
262K Context | 128K |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~75-79% | ~75-79% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
20 RPM on free models (60 RPM for paying orgs) | ~1 request/second (Flash models) |
|
Daily Limit
|
200 requests/day (new orgs) / 1,000/day (paying orgs), shared across free models | ~1,000 requests/day (Flash tier) |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
B-Tier (Strong) | B-Tier (Strong) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
⚡ Very Fast | ⚡ Very Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
⚡ Fast Chat & Apps | ⚡ Fast Chat & Apps |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
vs
inclusionAI Ling 3.0 Flash Sante
GLM-4.7-Flash
vs
inclusionAI Ling 3.0 Flash Sante
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
vs
GLM-4.5-Flash
GLM-4.7-Flash
vs
GLM-4.5-Flash
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
vs
GLM-4.6V-Flash (vision)
GLM-4.7-Flash
vs
GLM-4.6V-Flash (vision)
GLM-4.7-Flash
vs
GPT-4o (via routing)
GLM-4.7-Flash
vs
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
GLM-4.7-Flash
vs
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
GLM-4.7-Flash
vs
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra
GLM-4.7-Flash
vs
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super
GLM-4.7-Flash
vs
Poolside Laguna XS.2