Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
A-TIERRequesty
Intelligence Score
83/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
262K Context
Pricing Model
Free / Open
GPT-4o
S-TIEROpenAI
Intelligence Score
92/100
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity
0 votes
Commercial/Paid Model
FINAL VERDICT
GPT-4o Wins
With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 83/100, GPT-4o outperforms inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash by 9 points.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
|
GPT-4o
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
262K Context | 128K |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer (Proprietary) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~75-79% | ~85-87% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | May-Nov 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Paid / Commercial |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
20 RPM on free models (60 RPM for paying orgs) | 10,000 RPM |
|
Daily Limit
|
200 requests/day (new orgs) / 1,000/day (paying orgs), shared across free models | Based on tier |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
Vision
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
|
|
Performance Tier
|
B-Tier (Strong) | A-Tier (Excellent) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
⚡ Very Fast | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
⚡ Fast Chat & Apps | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | ~1.8T (estimated) |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
vs
inclusionAI Ling 3.0 Flash Sante
GPT-4o
vs
inclusionAI Ling 3.0 Flash Sante
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
vs
GPT-4o (via Coze)
GPT-4o
vs
GPT-4o (via Coze)
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
vs
GPT-4o (via routing)
GPT-4o
vs
GPT-4o (via routing)
GPT-4o
vs
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
GPT-4o
vs
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
GPT-4o
vs
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra
GPT-4o
vs
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super
GPT-4o
vs
Poolside Laguna XS.2
GPT-4o
vs
Poolside Laguna M.1