Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
GPT-4o
S-TIEROpenAI
Intelligence Score
92/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Commercial/Paid Model
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
A-TIERRequesty
Intelligence Score
87/100
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
GPT-4o Wins
With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 87/100, GPT-4o outperforms Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) by 5 points.
Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
GPT-4o
|
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
128K | 128K |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Proprietary) | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~85-87% | ~80-84% |
|
Release Date
|
May-Nov 2024 | Jul 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Paid / Commercial |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
10,000 RPM | 60 RPM |
|
Daily Limit
|
Based on tier | Credit-based |
|
Capabilities
|
Vision
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
A-Tier (Excellent) | A-Tier (Excellent) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | ⚡ Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
~1.8T (estimated) | 70B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
GPT-4o
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
GPT-4o
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
GPT-4o
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
vs
meta/llama-3-70b-instruct
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct