Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
A-TIERRequesty
Intelligence Score
83/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
262K Context
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Qwen3 8B
SiliconFlow
Intelligence Score
71/100
Context Window
128K Context
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash Wins
With an intelligence score of 83/100 vs 71/100, inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash outperforms Qwen3 8B by 12 points.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
|
Qwen3 8B
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
262K Context | 128K Context |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~75-79% | ~65-69% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
20 RPM on free models (60 RPM for paying orgs) | Fixed limits for free models — exact figures require login, verify on cloud.siliconflow.cn/models |
|
Daily Limit
|
200 requests/day (new orgs) / 1,000/day (paying orgs), shared across free models | Not fully published — verify on docs.siliconflow.cn |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
B-Tier (Strong) | C-Tier (Good) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
⚡ Very Fast | ⚡ Very Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
⚡ Fast Chat & Apps | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | 8B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
vs
inclusionAI Ling 3.0 Flash Sante
Qwen3 8B
vs
inclusionAI Ling 3.0 Flash Sante
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
vs
Qwen3.8 27B
Qwen3 8B
vs
Qwen3.8 27B
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
vs
Qwen3.8 27B
Qwen3 8B
vs
Qwen3.8 27B
Qwen3 8B
vs
Qwen3.6 35B
Qwen3 8B
vs
Qwen3.8 27B (GGUF)
Qwen3 8B
vs
Qwen3.5 72B Instruct
Qwen3 8B
vs
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Qwen3 8B
vs
Qwen3.8 27B
Qwen3 8B
vs
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507