Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
LFM2.5 2.6B
Kilo AI Gateway
Intelligence Score
65/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
65K Context
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Nebius (Token Factory)
Intelligence Score
76/100
Context Window
256K Context
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 Wins
With an intelligence score of 76/100 vs 65/100, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 outperforms LFM2.5 2.6B by 11 points.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
LFM2.5 2.6B
|
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
65K Context | 256K Context |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~60-64% | ~70-74% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
200 requests/hour per IP on free models (anonymous use allowed) | Dynamic limits (adaptive per 15-minute window, not a fixed RPM) |
|
Daily Limit
|
Default free models only | Credit-based |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
C-Tier (Good) | B-Tier (Strong) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
2.6B | 235B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
LFM2.5 2.6B
vs
Qwen3.8 27B
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
vs
Qwen3.8 27B
LFM2.5 2.6B
vs
Qwen3.8 27B
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
vs
Qwen3.8 27B
LFM2.5 2.6B
vs
Qwen3.6 35B
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
vs
Qwen3.6 35B
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
vs
Qwen3.8 27B (GGUF)
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
vs
Qwen3.5 72B Instruct
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
vs
Llama 3.1 70B
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
vs
Mistral Large
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
vs
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning