Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
S-TIERDeepInfra
Intelligence Score
92/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Groq Compound
Groq
Intelligence Score
65/100
Context Window
250 RPD, 70k TPM
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct Wins
With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 65/100, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct outperforms Groq Compound by 27 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Llama 3.1 405B Instruct.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
|
Groq Compound
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
128K | 250 RPD, 70k TPM |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Open Weight) | Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~85-87% | ~60-64% |
|
Release Date
|
Jul 2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
60 RPM (varies by model) | 30 RPM, 14.4k RPD |
|
Daily Limit
|
Credit-based (no daily cap) | 14,400 Requests/Day |
|
Capabilities
|
Reasoning
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
A-Tier (Excellent) | C-Tier (Good) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
🐢 Slower (Reasoning) | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
405B | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Groq Compound
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Groq Compound
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Groq Compound
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Groq Compound
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
Groq Compound
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Groq Compound
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Groq Compound
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Groq Compound
vs
meta/llama-3-70b-instruct
Groq Compound
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct