Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)

A-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 87/100

Model Popularity 0 votes

Context Window 128K

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

View Provider Analysis →

S-TIER

Google

Intelligence Score 93/100

Context Window 1M

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Model Popularity 0 votes

Commercial/Paid Model

FINAL VERDICT

With an intelligence score of 93/100 vs 87/100, Gemini 2.0 Flash outperforms Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) by 6 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Feature	Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)	Gemini 2.0 Flash
Context Window	128K	1M
Architecture	Transformer (Open Weight)	Transformer (Proprietary)
Est. MMLU Score	~80-84%	~88-91%
Release Date	Jul 2024	Dec 2024
Pricing Model	Paid / Commercial	Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)	60 RPM	2,000 RPM
Daily Limit	Credit-based	1,500 requests/day (free tier)
Capabilities	No specific data	Vision Function Calling Streaming JSON Mode
Performance Tier	A-Tier (Excellent)	S-Tier (Elite)
Speed Estimate	⚡ Fast	⚡ Very Fast
Primary Use Case	General Purpose	⚡ Fast Chat & Apps
Model Size	70B	~1.5T (estimated)
Limitations	Requires underlying provider API keys Free credit amount is limited Routing adds minimal latency	API key required Rate limits vary by region
Key Strengths	AI Router: automatic provider failover Prompt caching for cost savings Multi-provider load balancing	Massive context window Multimodal Fast inference