Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Llama 3.1 8B

Groq

Intelligence Score 78/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 14.4k RPD, 6k TPM
Pricing Model Free / Open

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 93/100
Context Window 200K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 93/100 vs 78/100, Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) outperforms Llama 3.1 8B by 15 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing).
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Llama 3.1 8B
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
Context Window
14.4k RPD, 6k TPM 200K
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Transformer (Proprietary)
Est. MMLU Score
~70-74% ~88-91%
Release Date
Jul 2024 Jun-Oct 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
30 RPM, 14.4k RPD 60 RPM
Daily Limit
14,400 Requests/Day Credit-based
Capabilities
No specific data
Reasoning
Performance Tier
B-Tier (Strong) S-Tier (Elite)
Speed Estimate
âš¡ Very Fast Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
8B Unknown
Limitations
  • Test
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
Key Strengths
  • LPU Accelerated
  • Extremely Fast Inference
  • Open Source Models
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing

Similar Comparisons