Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
Cerebrium
Intelligence Score
65/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Groq Compound
Groq
Intelligence Score
65/100
Context Window
250 RPD, 70k TPM
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Groq Compound Wins
Equal intelligence scores (65/100), but Groq Compound offers a significantly larger context window.
Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
|
Groq Compound
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
128K | 250 RPD, 70k TPM |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Open Weight) | Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~60-64% | ~60-64% |
|
Release Date
|
Jul 2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
Pay-per-second compute | 30 RPM, 14.4k RPD |
|
Daily Limit
|
Credit-based | 14,400 Requests/Day |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
C-Tier (Good) | C-Tier (Good) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Groq Compound
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Groq Compound
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Groq Compound
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Groq Compound
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
Groq Compound
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Groq Compound
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Groq Compound
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Groq Compound
vs
meta/llama-3-70b-instruct
Groq Compound
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct