Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Llama 3 8B Instruct

BentoML

Intelligence Score 71/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 8K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
View Provider Analysis →

Groq Compound

Groq

Intelligence Score 65/100
Context Window 250 RPD, 70k TPM
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

Llama 3 8B Instruct Wins

With an intelligence score of 71/100 vs 65/100, Llama 3 8B Instruct outperforms Groq Compound by 6 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Llama 3 8B Instruct
Groq Compound
Context Window
8K 250 RPD, 70k TPM
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~65-69% ~60-64%
Release Date
2024 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
Hardware dependent 30 RPM, 14.4k RPD
Daily Limit
Unlimited 14,400 Requests/Day
Capabilities
No specific data
No specific data
Performance Tier
C-Tier (Good) C-Tier (Good)
Speed Estimate
⚡ Very Fast Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
8B Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Learning curve for 'Bento' concept
  • Deployment requires cloud knowledge
  • Local serving is just step 1
  • Test
Key Strengths
  • Unified Model Store
  • Distributed Runner Architecture
  • Deployment Agnostic
  • LPU Accelerated
  • Extremely Fast Inference
  • Open Source Models

Similar Comparisons

Llama 3 8B Instruct
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Groq Compound
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 3 8B Instruct
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Groq Compound
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 3 8B Instruct
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Groq Compound
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Groq Compound
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
Groq Compound
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Groq Compound
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Groq Compound
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Groq Compound
vs
meta/llama-3-70b-instruct
Groq Compound
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct