Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Llama 4 Scout
A-TIERGroq
Intelligence Score
87/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
1k RPD, 30k TPM
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Groq Compound
Groq
Intelligence Score
65/100
Context Window
250 RPD, 70k TPM
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Llama 4 Scout Wins
With an intelligence score of 87/100 vs 65/100, Llama 4 Scout outperforms Groq Compound by 22 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Llama 4 Scout.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Llama 4 Scout
|
Groq Compound
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
1k RPD, 30k TPM | 250 RPD, 70k TPM |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Open Weight) | Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~80-84% | ~60-64% |
|
Release Date
|
2026 (Latest) | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
30 RPM, 14.4k RPD | 30 RPM, 14.4k RPD |
|
Daily Limit
|
14,400 Requests/Day | 14,400 Requests/Day |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
A-Tier (Excellent) | C-Tier (Good) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
⚡ Very Fast | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Llama 4 Scout
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Groq Compound
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 4 Scout
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Groq Compound
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 4 Scout
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Groq Compound
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Groq Compound
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
Groq Compound
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Groq Compound
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Groq Compound
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Groq Compound
vs
meta/llama-3-70b-instruct
Groq Compound
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct