Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Mistral Nemo

A-TIER

Mistral (La Plateforme)

Intelligence Score 80/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 128k
Pricing Model Free / Open

Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)

A-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 87/100
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 87/100 vs 80/100, Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) outperforms Mistral Nemo by 7 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Mistral Nemo
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
Context Window
128k 128K
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score
~75-79% ~80-84%
Release Date
2024 Jul 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
1 request/second 60 RPM
Daily Limit
- Credit-based
Capabilities
No specific data
No specific data
Performance Tier
B-Tier (Strong) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
Medium ⚡ Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Undisclosed 70B
Limitations
  • Phone verification required
  • Data training opt-in required
  • 1 request/second rate limit
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
Key Strengths
  • Access to Mistral's open-weight models
  • OpenAI-compatible API endpoints
  • Function calling support
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing

Similar Comparisons