Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Moonshot Kimi K2 0905

A-TIER

Groq

Intelligence Score 85/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 1k RPD, 10k TPM
Pricing Model Free / Open
View Provider Analysis →

LLaVA 1.5

A-TIER

llamafile

Intelligence Score 81/100
Context Window Local
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

Moonshot Kimi K2 0905 Wins

With an intelligence score of 85/100 vs 81/100, Moonshot Kimi K2 0905 outperforms LLaVA 1.5 by 4 points.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Moonshot Kimi K2 0905
LLaVA 1.5
Context Window
1k RPD, 10k TPM Local
Architecture
Transformer Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~80-84% ~75-79%
Release Date
2024 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
30 RPM, 14.4k RPD Hardware dependent
Daily Limit
14,400 Requests/Day Unlimited
Capabilities
No specific data
Vision
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) B-Tier (Strong)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Undisclosed Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Test
  • File sizes are large (contain weights)
  • CLI usage often required
  • Windows requires appending .exe
Key Strengths
  • LPU Accelerated
  • Extremely Fast Inference
  • Open Source Models
  • Executable weight files (multi-OS)
  • Integrated Web UI
  • OpenAI Compatible API server

Similar Comparisons

Moonshot Kimi K2 0905
vs
Allam 2 7B
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Allam 2 7B
Moonshot Kimi K2 0905
vs
Llama 3.1 8B
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Llama 3.1 8B
Moonshot Kimi K2 0905
vs
Llama 3.3 70B
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Llama 3.3 70B
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Llama 4 Maverick 17B
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Llama 4 Scout
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Whisper Large v3
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Whisper Large v3 Turbo
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Groq Compound
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Groq Compound Mini