Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Moonshot Kimi K2

A-TIER

Groq

Intelligence Score 85/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 1k RPD, 10k TPM
Pricing Model Free / Open
View Provider Analysis →

LLaVA 1.5

A-TIER

llamafile

Intelligence Score 81/100
Context Window Local
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

Moonshot Kimi K2 Wins

With an intelligence score of 85/100 vs 81/100, Moonshot Kimi K2 outperforms LLaVA 1.5 by 4 points.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Moonshot Kimi K2
LLaVA 1.5
Context Window
1k RPD, 10k TPM Local
Architecture
Transformer Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~80-84% ~75-79%
Release Date
2024 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
30 RPM, 14.4k RPD Hardware dependent
Daily Limit
14,400 Requests/Day Unlimited
Capabilities
No specific data
Vision
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) B-Tier (Strong)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Undisclosed Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Test
  • File sizes are large (contain weights)
  • CLI usage often required
  • Windows requires appending .exe
Key Strengths
  • LPU Accelerated
  • Extremely Fast Inference
  • Open Source Models
  • Executable weight files (multi-OS)
  • Integrated Web UI
  • OpenAI Compatible API server

Similar Comparisons

Moonshot Kimi K2
vs
Allam 2 7B
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Allam 2 7B
Moonshot Kimi K2
vs
Llama 3.1 8B
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Llama 3.1 8B
Moonshot Kimi K2
vs
Llama 3.3 70B
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Llama 3.3 70B
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Llama 4 Maverick 17B
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Llama 4 Scout
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Whisper Large v3
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Whisper Large v3 Turbo
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Groq Compound
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Groq Compound Mini