Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Poolside Laguna XS.2
Requesty
Intelligence Score
65/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
Long context
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Step 3.7 Flash
A-TIERRouteway
Intelligence Score
83/100
Context Window
See provider
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Step 3.7 Flash Wins
With an intelligence score of 83/100 vs 65/100, Step 3.7 Flash outperforms Poolside Laguna XS.2 by 18 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Step 3.7 Flash.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Poolside Laguna XS.2
|
Step 3.7 Flash
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
Long context | See provider |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~60-64% | ~75-79% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
60 RPM | 5 RPM (community submission) |
|
Daily Limit
|
50 requests/day (new orgs) / 200 requests/day (paying orgs), shared across all free models | 200 requests/day |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
C-Tier (Good) | B-Tier (Strong) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | ⚡ Very Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | ⚡ Fast Chat & Apps |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Poolside Laguna XS.2
vs
Poolside Laguna S 2.1
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Poolside Laguna S 2.1
Poolside Laguna XS.2
vs
Poolside Laguna XS 2.1
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Poolside Laguna XS 2.1
Poolside Laguna XS.2
vs
GPT-4o (via routing)
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
GPT-4o (via routing)
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Poolside Laguna M.1
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
GPT OSS 120B