Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Qwen 2.5

LLM7.io

Intelligence Score 65/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 32K
Pricing Model Free / Open

GLM-4.7-Flash

A-TIER

Z.AI (GLM)

Intelligence Score 83/100
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

GLM-4.7-Flash Wins

With an intelligence score of 83/100 vs 65/100, GLM-4.7-Flash outperforms Qwen 2.5 by 18 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for GLM-4.7-Flash.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Qwen 2.5
GLM-4.7-Flash
Context Window
32K 128K
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~60-64% ~75-79%
Release Date
Sep-Nov 2024 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
30 RPM (no signup) / 120 RPM (free email token) ~1 request/second (Flash models)
Daily Limit
Up to 5M tokens/day (rolling 24h, with free token) ~1,000 requests/day (Flash tier)
Capabilities
No specific data
No specific data
Performance Tier
C-Tier (Good) B-Tier (Strong)
Speed Estimate
Medium ⚡ Very Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose ⚡ Fast Chat & Apps
Model Size
Undisclosed Undisclosed
Limitations
  • No signup tier is heavily rate-limited (30 RPM)
  • Smaller, less well-known provider — verify uptime before production use
  • Free Flash tier capped near 1 request/second
  • Flagship GLM-5.2 model requires a paid plan
  • Free-tier limits have changed more than once in the past year — verify on docs.z.ai
Key Strengths
  • Works with zero signup
  • OpenAI-compatible endpoint — swap base_url + key
  • No signup required for basic use
  • GLM-4.5-Flash & GLM-4.7-Flash Free Access
  • Strong Coding Benchmarks
  • OpenAI-Compatible Endpoint

Similar Comparisons