Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Qwen-Turbo

Qwen (Alibaba)

Intelligence Score 78/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 32K tokens
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 93/100
Context Window 200K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 93/100 vs 78/100, Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) outperforms Qwen-Turbo by 15 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing).
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Qwen-Turbo
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
Context Window
32K tokens 200K
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Transformer (Proprietary)
Est. MMLU Score
~70-74% ~88-91%
Release Date
2024 Jun-Oct 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM 60 RPM
Daily Limit
Credit-based Credit-based
Capabilities
No specific data
Reasoning
Performance Tier
B-Tier (Strong) S-Tier (Elite)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Undisclosed Unknown
Limitations
  • Requires Alibaba Cloud account (Payment method)
  • Dashboard can be complex
  • Region selection matters
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
Key Strengths
  • Qwen Family: Top tier open weights
  • Multimodal capabilities (VL models)
  • Search Plugin integration
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing

Similar Comparisons