Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Nebius (Token Factory)
Intelligence Score
76/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
256K Context
Pricing Model
Free / Open
GLM 5.2
Scaleway Generative APIs
Intelligence Score
65/100
Context Window
256K Context
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 Wins
With an intelligence score of 76/100 vs 65/100, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 outperforms GLM 5.2 by 11 points.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
|
GLM 5.2
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
256K Context | 256K Context |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Open Weight) | Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~70-74% | ~60-64% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
Dynamic limits (adaptive per 15-minute window, not a fixed RPM) | 60 RPM |
|
Daily Limit
|
Credit-based | Credit-based |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
B-Tier (Strong) | C-Tier (Good) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
235B | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
vs
Qwen3.8 27B
GLM 5.2
vs
Qwen3.8 27B
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
vs
Qwen3.8 27B
GLM 5.2
vs
Qwen3.8 27B
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
vs
Qwen3.6 35B
GLM 5.2
vs
Qwen3.6 35B
GLM 5.2
vs
Qwen3.8 27B (GGUF)
GLM 5.2
vs
Qwen3.5 72B Instruct
GLM 5.2
vs
GLM 5.3
GLM 5.2
vs
GLM 5.3 Flash
GLM 5.2
vs
Llama 3.1 70B
GLM 5.2
vs
Mistral Large