Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Qwen3 32B
Groq
Intelligence Score
79/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
1k RPD, 6k TPM
Pricing Model
Free / Open
TinyLlama
llamafile
Intelligence Score
64/100
Context Window
Local
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Qwen3 32B Wins
With an intelligence score of 79/100 vs 64/100, Qwen3 32B outperforms TinyLlama by 15 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Qwen3 32B.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Qwen3 32B
|
TinyLlama
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
1k RPD, 6k TPM | Local |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Open Weight) | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~70-74% | ~60-64% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
30 RPM, 14.4k RPD | Hardware dependent |
|
Daily Limit
|
14,400 Requests/Day | Unlimited |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
B-Tier (Strong) | C-Tier (Good) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
32B | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Qwen3 32B
vs
Llama 4 Maverick 17B
TinyLlama
vs
Llama 4 Maverick 17B
Qwen3 32B
vs
Llama 4 Scout
TinyLlama
vs
Llama 4 Scout
Qwen3 32B
vs
Whisper Large v3
TinyLlama
vs
Whisper Large v3
TinyLlama
vs
Whisper Large v3 Turbo
TinyLlama
vs
Groq Compound
TinyLlama
vs
Groq Compound Mini
TinyLlama
vs
Llama Guard 4 12B
TinyLlama
vs
Moonshot Kimi K2
TinyLlama
vs
Moonshot Kimi K2 0905