Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Hetzner Inference API
Intelligence Score
65/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
262K
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Step 3.7 Flash
A-TIERRouteway
Intelligence Score
83/100
Context Window
See provider
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Step 3.7 Flash Wins
With an intelligence score of 83/100 vs 65/100, Step 3.7 Flash outperforms Qwen3.6 35B A3B by 18 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Step 3.7 Flash.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Qwen3.6 35B A3B
|
Step 3.7 Flash
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
262K | See provider |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Open Weight) | Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~60-64% | ~75-79% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
3M input / 60K output tokens per 60s | 5 RPM (community submission) |
|
Daily Limit
|
500M input / 5M output tokens per 24h | 200 requests/day |
|
Capabilities
|
Vision
Reasoning
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
C-Tier (Good) | B-Tier (Strong) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | ⚡ Very Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | ⚡ Fast Chat & Apps |
|
Model Size
|
35B | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Qwen3.6 35B A3B
vs
Qwen3.6 27B
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Qwen3.6 27B
Qwen3.6 35B A3B
vs
Qwen3.6 Plus
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Qwen3.6 Plus
Qwen3.6 35B A3B
vs
Qwen3.6 27B
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Qwen3.6 27B
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
GPT OSS 120B
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Laguna XS.2
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Gemma 4 31B
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash