Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

stability-ai/sdxl

A-TIER

Replicate

Intelligence Score 84/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window Image
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
View Provider Analysis →

Phi-3.5 Mini

Ollama

Intelligence Score 65/100
Context Window 128K tokens
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

stability-ai/sdxl Wins

With an intelligence score of 84/100 vs 65/100, stability-ai/sdxl outperforms Phi-3.5 Mini by 19 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for stability-ai/sdxl.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
stability-ai/sdxl
Phi-3.5 Mini
Context Window
Image 128K tokens
Architecture
Transformer Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~75-79% ~60-64%
Release Date
2024 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
Varies by model Hardware limited
Daily Limit
Credit-based Unlimited
Capabilities
No specific data
Reasoning
Performance Tier
B-Tier (Strong) C-Tier (Good)
Speed Estimate
Medium âš¡ Very Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose âš¡ Fast Chat & Apps
Model Size
Undisclosed Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Pay-per-second billing (can be expensive)
  • Cold starts for less popular models
  • Trial credits are minimal
  • Depends on your RAM/GPU
  • Laptop fans will spin up
  • Large models (70B+) need heavy hardware
Key Strengths
  • Run any public model with an API
  • Fine-tune existing models easily
  • Cold boots can be slow for unpopular models
  • Local Inference: Data never leaves your device
  • Modelfiles: Script your own system prompts
  • API: Local REST API for app integration

Similar Comparisons

stability-ai/sdxl
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
Phi-3.5 Mini
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
stability-ai/sdxl
vs
Gemma 2 9B
Phi-3.5 Mini
vs
Gemma 2 9B
stability-ai/sdxl
vs
Mistral Nemo 12B
Phi-3.5 Mini
vs
Mistral Nemo 12B
Phi-3.5 Mini
vs
DeepSeek Coder V2
Phi-3.5 Mini
vs
mistralai/mistral-7b-instruct-v0.2
Phi-3.5 Mini
vs
meta/llama-3-70b-instruct