Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

stability-ai/sdxl

A-TIER

Replicate

Intelligence Score 84/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window Image
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Qwen 2.5 72B

S-TIER

Hyperbolic

Intelligence Score 91/100
Context Window 32K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Qwen 2.5 72B Wins

With an intelligence score of 91/100 vs 84/100, Qwen 2.5 72B outperforms stability-ai/sdxl by 7 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
stability-ai/sdxl
Qwen 2.5 72B
Context Window
Image 32K
Architecture
Transformer Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score
~75-79% ~85-87%
Release Date
2024 Sep-Nov 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
Varies by model 60 RPM
Daily Limit
Credit-based Credit-based
Capabilities
No specific data
No specific data
Performance Tier
B-Tier (Strong) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
Medium ⚡ Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Undisclosed 72B
Limitations
  • Pay-per-second billing (can be expensive)
  • Cold starts for less popular models
  • Trial credits are minimal
  • Credits are limited ($1)
  • Decentralized nature may vary latency
  • Billing flow involves crypto/stripe
Key Strengths
  • Run any public model with an API
  • Fine-tune existing models easily
  • Cold boots can be slow for unpopular models
  • Verifiable Inference (verified computing)
  • Low Cost due to decentralized compute
  • Privacy focused

Similar Comparisons