Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

TinyLlama

llamafile

Intelligence Score 64/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window Local
Pricing Model Free / Open

Groq Compound Mini

Groq

Intelligence Score 65/100
Context Window 250 RPD, 70k TPM
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Groq Compound Mini Wins

With an intelligence score of 65/100 vs 64/100, Groq Compound Mini outperforms TinyLlama by 1 point.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
TinyLlama
Groq Compound Mini
Context Window
Local 250 RPD, 70k TPM
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~60-64% ~60-64%
Release Date
2024 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
Hardware dependent 30 RPM, 14.4k RPD
Daily Limit
Unlimited 14,400 Requests/Day
Capabilities
No specific data
No specific data
Performance Tier
C-Tier (Good) C-Tier (Good)
Speed Estimate
Medium ⚡ Very Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose ⚡ Fast Chat & Apps
Model Size
Undisclosed Undisclosed
Limitations
  • File sizes are large (contain weights)
  • CLI usage often required
  • Windows requires appending .exe
  • Test
Key Strengths
  • Executable weight files (multi-OS)
  • Integrated Web UI
  • OpenAI Compatible API server
  • LPU Accelerated
  • Extremely Fast Inference
  • Open Source Models

Similar Comparisons