Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

TinyLlama

llamafile

Intelligence Score 64/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window Local
Pricing Model Free / Open
View Provider Analysis →

Moonshot Kimi K2

A-TIER

Groq

Intelligence Score 85/100
Context Window 1k RPD, 10k TPM
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

Moonshot Kimi K2 Wins

With an intelligence score of 85/100 vs 64/100, Moonshot Kimi K2 outperforms TinyLlama by 21 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Moonshot Kimi K2.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
TinyLlama
Moonshot Kimi K2
Context Window
Local 1k RPD, 10k TPM
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~60-64% ~80-84%
Release Date
2024 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
Hardware dependent 30 RPM, 14.4k RPD
Daily Limit
Unlimited 14,400 Requests/Day
Capabilities
No specific data
No specific data
Performance Tier
C-Tier (Good) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Undisclosed Undisclosed
Limitations
  • File sizes are large (contain weights)
  • CLI usage often required
  • Windows requires appending .exe
  • Test
Key Strengths
  • Executable weight files (multi-OS)
  • Integrated Web UI
  • OpenAI Compatible API server
  • LPU Accelerated
  • Extremely Fast Inference
  • Open Source Models

Similar Comparisons

TinyLlama
vs
Allam 2 7B
Moonshot Kimi K2
vs
Allam 2 7B
TinyLlama
vs
Llama 3.1 8B
Moonshot Kimi K2
vs
Llama 3.1 8B
TinyLlama
vs
Llama 3.3 70B
Moonshot Kimi K2
vs
Llama 3.3 70B
Moonshot Kimi K2
vs
Llama 4 Maverick 17B
Moonshot Kimi K2
vs
Llama 4 Scout
Moonshot Kimi K2
vs
Whisper Large v3
Moonshot Kimi K2
vs
Whisper Large v3 Turbo
Moonshot Kimi K2
vs
Groq Compound
Moonshot Kimi K2
vs
Groq Compound Mini