Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

TinyLlama

llamafile

Intelligence Score 64/100

Model Popularity 0 votes

Context Window Local

Pricing Model Free / Open

View Provider Analysis →

S-TIER

Hyperbolic

Intelligence Score 91/100

Context Window 32K

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Model Popularity 0 votes

View Provider Analysis →

FINAL VERDICT

With an intelligence score of 91/100 vs 64/100, Qwen 2.5 72B outperforms TinyLlama by 27 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Qwen 2.5 72B.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Feature	TinyLlama	Qwen 2.5 72B
Context Window	Local	32K
Architecture	Transformer (Open Weight)	Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score	~60-64%	~85-87%
Release Date	2024	Sep-Nov 2024
Pricing Model	Free Tier	Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)	Hardware dependent	60 RPM
Daily Limit	Unlimited	Credit-based
Capabilities	No specific data	No specific data
Performance Tier	C-Tier (Good)	A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate	Medium	⚡ Fast
Primary Use Case	General Purpose	General Purpose
Model Size	Undisclosed	72B
Limitations	File sizes are large (contain weights) CLI usage often required Windows requires appending .exe	Credits are limited ($1) Decentralized nature may vary latency Billing flow involves crypto/stripe
Key Strengths	Executable weight files (multi-OS) Integrated Web UI OpenAI Compatible API server	Verifiable Inference (verified computing) Low Cost due to decentralized compute Privacy focused