Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
GLM-4.5-Flash
A-TIERZ.AI (GLM)
Intelligence Score
83/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Free / Open
GPT-4o (via routing)
S-TIERRequesty
Intelligence Score
92/100
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
GPT-4o (via routing) Wins
With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 83/100, GPT-4o (via routing) outperforms GLM-4.5-Flash by 9 points.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
GLM-4.5-Flash
|
GPT-4o (via routing)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
128K | 128K |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer (Proprietary) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~75-79% | ~85-87% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | May-Nov 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Paid / Commercial |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
~1 request/second (Flash models) | 60 RPM |
|
Daily Limit
|
~1,000 requests/day (Flash tier) | Credit-based |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
Vision
|
|
Performance Tier
|
B-Tier (Strong) | A-Tier (Excellent) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
⚡ Very Fast | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
⚡ Fast Chat & Apps | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | ~1.8T (estimated) |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
GLM-4.5-Flash
vs
GPT-4o
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
GPT-4o
GLM-4.5-Flash
vs
GPT-4o (via Coze)
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
GPT-4o (via Coze)
GLM-4.5-Flash
vs
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
GLM-4.7-Flash