Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Allam 2 7B

Groq

Intelligence Score 76/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 7k RPD, 6k TPM
Pricing Model Free / Open

Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)

A-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 87/100
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 87/100 vs 76/100, Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) outperforms Allam 2 7B by 11 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Allam 2 7B
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
Context Window
7k RPD, 6k TPM 128K
Architecture
Transformer Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score
~70-74% ~80-84%
Release Date
2024 Jul 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
30 RPM, 14.4k RPD 60 RPM
Daily Limit
14,400 Requests/Day Credit-based
Capabilities
No specific data
No specific data
Performance Tier
B-Tier (Strong) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
⚡ Very Fast ⚡ Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
7B 70B
Limitations
  • Test
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
Key Strengths
  • LPU Accelerated
  • Extremely Fast Inference
  • Open Source Models
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing

Similar Comparisons