Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 93/100

Model Popularity 0 votes

Context Window 200K

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

View Provider Analysis →

S-TIER

Grok (xAI)

Intelligence Score 96/100

Context Window 2M

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Model Popularity 0 votes

View Provider Analysis →

FINAL VERDICT

With an intelligence score of 96/100 vs 93/100, Grok 4.1 Fast outperforms Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) by 3 points.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Feature	Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)	Grok 4.1 Fast
Context Window	200K	2M
Architecture	Transformer (Proprietary)	Transformer
Est. MMLU Score	~88-91%	~92-95%
Release Date	Jun-Oct 2024	2024
Pricing Model	Paid / Commercial	Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)	60 RPM	Varies (low for free tier)
Daily Limit	Credit-based	Credit-based
Capabilities	Reasoning	No specific data
Performance Tier	S-Tier (Elite)	S-Tier (Elite)
Speed Estimate	Medium	Medium
Primary Use Case	General Purpose	General Purpose
Model Size	Unknown	Undisclosed
Limitations	Requires underlying provider API keys Free credit amount is limited Routing adds minimal latency	$25/month credit cap (generous but finite) Lower rate limits on free tier Vision models have smaller context
Key Strengths	AI Router: automatic provider failover Prompt caching for cost savings Multi-provider load balancing	Monthly renewing $25 free credits OpenAI-compatible API (drop-in replacement) Real-time knowledge from X/Twitter data