Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 93/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 200K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
View Provider Analysis →

Grok 2 Mini

A-TIER

xAI

Intelligence Score 87/100
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
Commercial/Paid Model
FINAL VERDICT

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 93/100 vs 87/100, Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) outperforms Grok 2 Mini by 6 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
Grok 2 Mini
Context Window
200K 128K
Architecture
Transformer (Proprietary) Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~88-91% ~80-84%
Release Date
Jun-Oct 2024 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM Varies
Daily Limit
Credit-based Based on tier
Capabilities
Reasoning
Streaming
Performance Tier
S-Tier (Elite) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
Medium âš¡ Very Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose âš¡ Fast Chat & Apps
Model Size
Unknown Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
  • API key required
Key Strengths
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing
  • Fast
  • Efficient
  • Real-time data access

Similar Comparisons

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
vs
GPT-4o (via routing)
Grok 2 Mini
vs
GPT-4o (via routing)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
vs
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
Grok 2 Mini
vs
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
vs
Grok-2
Grok 2 Mini
vs
Grok-2
Grok 2 Mini
vs
Grok-2 Vision