Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)

DEPRECATED

Requesty

This model is no longer active/free — kept for reference.

Intelligence Score 93/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 200K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

grok-4.3

S-TIER

Grokified

Intelligence Score 98/100
Context Window Unknown
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

grok-4.3 Wins

With an intelligence score of 98/100 vs 93/100, grok-4.3 outperforms Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) by 5 points.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
grok-4.3
Context Window
200K Unknown
Architecture
Transformer (Proprietary) Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~88-91% ~92-95%
Release Date
Jun-Oct 2024 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM No request-count cap; 32K input tokens/request
Daily Limit
50 requests/day (new orgs) / 200 requests/day (paying orgs), shared across all free models $8/day and $3/hour of free credit
Capabilities
Reasoning
No specific data
Performance Tier
S-Tier (Elite) S-Tier (Elite)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Unknown Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
  • One-time credit, not a recurring free tier
  • grok-4.7 and image/video quality variants need a paid plan
  • Third-party reseller, independent from xAI
Key Strengths
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing
  • $5 one-time credit, no card
  • 50% off list price
  • OpenAI-compatible

Similar Comparisons