Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 93/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 200K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
View Provider Analysis →

Stable Diffusion 3

Stability AI

Intelligence Score 65/100
Context Window N/A
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
Commercial/Paid Model
FINAL VERDICT

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 93/100 vs 65/100, Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) outperforms Stable Diffusion 3 by 28 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing).
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
Stable Diffusion 3
Context Window
200K N/A
Architecture
Transformer (Proprietary) Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~88-91% ~60-64%
Release Date
Jun-Oct 2024 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM 50 images/min
Daily Limit
Credit-based Based on tier
Capabilities
Reasoning
Image Generation
Performance Tier
S-Tier (Elite) C-Tier (Good)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Unknown Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
  • API key required
  • Content policy restrictions
Key Strengths
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing
  • High quality images
  • Multiple styles
  • Fast generation

Similar Comparisons

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
vs
stable-diffusion-xl-base-v10
Stable Diffusion 3
vs
stable-diffusion-xl-base-v10
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
vs
GPT-4o (via routing)
Stable Diffusion 3
vs
GPT-4o (via routing)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
vs
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
Stable Diffusion 3
vs
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)