Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

A-TIER

Google AI Studio

Intelligence Score 85/100

Model Popularity 0 votes

Context Window 1M Context, 15 RPM

Pricing Model Free / Open

View Provider Analysis →

A-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 87/100

Context Window 128K

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Model Popularity 0 votes

View Provider Analysis →

FINAL VERDICT

With an intelligence score of 87/100 vs 85/100, Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) outperforms Gemini 1.5 Flash by 2 points.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Feature	Gemini 1.5 Flash	Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
Context Window	1M Context, 15 RPM	128K
Architecture	Transformer (Proprietary)	Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score	~80-84%	~80-84%
Release Date	Feb-May 2024	Jul 2024
Pricing Model	Free Tier	Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)	2-15 RPM	60 RPM
Daily Limit	1,500 RPD (Flash) / 50 RPD (Pro)	Credit-based
Capabilities	Multimodal	No specific data
Performance Tier	A-Tier (Excellent)	A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate	⚡ Very Fast	⚡ Fast
Primary Use Case	⚡ Fast Chat & Apps	General Purpose
Model Size	~1.5T (estimated)	70B
Limitations	Data used for training (Unpaid tier) Rate limits are enforced per minute/day No SLA for free tier	Requires underlying provider API keys Free credit amount is limited Routing adds minimal latency
Key Strengths	Multimodal Capabilities Huge Context Window (up to 2M tokens) Fast Inference Speed	AI Router: automatic provider failover Prompt caching for cost savings Multi-provider load balancing